Here’s a copy of the presentation I’m giving today at Interop. It looks at the perils and best practices of moving an application from internally-run to software-as-a-service.
Here’s a copy of the presentation I’m giving today at Interop. It looks at the perils and best practices of moving an application from internally-run to software-as-a-service.
We’ll be presenting on web monitoring at MeshU.
Mesh is a part of Mesh, Canada’s web conference, which happens in mid-May in Toronto. Given Microsoft’s recent announcement of the Mesh technology to synchronize all your digital content, they can probably make a killing on the URL.
This will be a workshop/tutorial on the state of web monitoring, including web analytics, synthetic testing, and how to build monitor-ability into applications. I’m using lots of monitoring tools on Bitcurrent to collect raw materials for the session.
Playing around with Slideshare as a way of uploading my Pitfalls of SaaS post, I came across this latest from Morgan Stanley. Mary Meeker always has an enlightening view of the world.
| View | Upload your own
At O’Reilly’s conference on emerging web technologies in San Francisco last week, several of the hit topics from last year’s conference have become full-blown tracks this time around, reflecting how quickly a niche topic like the Facebook Query Language or the mobile web become mainstream.

Another key trend is the move away from traditional web-based interfaces to alternate ways of interacting with applications, from SMS or instant messenger to e-mail. Brady Forrest, co-chair of the event for O’Reilly Media, also listed personal analytics as a growing theme at the conference, citing applications like Socialistics that provide “lots of info porn on your network.”
While much of the event’s content revolves around the practice of running sites, there are a growing number of sessions on how to manage user communities, design interfaces, develop SEO-friendly applications, and include gameplay in sites. “We’ve done a really good job of making this a place where people can learn from those who are defining the future of the web,” said Forrest.
It’s a reflection that the job of web operations, which used to involve hardware, is now as much about managing analytics, communities, content, and legality.
The Interop track next week is all about cloud computing and software-as-a-service. The two aren’t necessarily related — in fact, there’s considerable confusion about what the difference between grid, cloud, and SaaS computing is, as well as a host of new acronyms: Platform As A Service (like Salesforce.com’s APEX), or Hardware-As A Service (what some folks are using to explain Amazon’s EC2.)
PaaS, HaaS … please, please, someone come up with Application As A Service.
I’m at Web2Expo this week, followed by Interop next week. I’m moderating a discussion between database heavyweights: Brian Aker, Director of Technology for MySQL; Dave Campbell, Microsoft Technical Fellow behind MS SQL Server; and Matt Domo, General Manager of Amazon SimpleDB. My first question should really be, “why isn’t Oracle here?”
But with the exception of that session, everything I’m seeing is virtual. Here’s my list of ten companies with a virtualization theme you should probably know about.
But wait, you say, that’s not ten! Yep, there are four in the list that I can’t get into yet. Stay tuned. They’re all twists on essential parts of a modern application, using bits instead of atoms. And that changes everything.
I’m not a huge fan of security and everything that is associated with it. That’s not because I don’t think it’s important; I actually think it’s critical in both networking and application development. But, rather, it’s just not my thing and I’ve usually been in technology areas where security is important, but somewhat peripheral.
That being said, I attended a couple of sessions at Web2Expo today where security issues were a takeaway in both.
First, Jacob West (who’s written a book on security) gave an interesting talk on the “Dark Side of Ajax.” It’s not news that Ajax has some significant security holes that have been exposed already and are somewhat well known. Some examples:
I’ve seen similar presentations at other Ajax/web2.0 events and it’s interesting to me how it’s a lot of talk about how there are problems and very little about what’s being done about them. Mr. West did talk about how some popular Ajax frameworks are addressing the javascript hijacking issue, which is great. But, what happens with the next vulnerability, and the one after that?
Most of the web operators we talk to have some degree of visibility into what goes on within their applications. But many lack a complete picture of their site.
There are hundreds of tools available to show what’s going on with a production website. But the problems arise when people try to use the wrong tool for the job, which often leads to bad conclusions. In my experience, operational questions fall into four major categories:
There are four classes of tool that answer these four questions. But they’re all similar enough to cause confusion. Here’s a clarification.
Web2Expo San Francisco is coming up. The conference has grown quickly; initially, as a reaction to the popularity of O’Reilly’s more blue-sky conference, Web2.0 (which is now called Web2Summit.) Following the success of Web2Summit — the organizers sold out their 2,000 registrations quickly and had to turn away thousands more — they launched the Expo.
Web2Expo isn’t just a spill-over conference; it’s now got an identity of its own. If the folks at Web2Summit speculate and scheme, then it’s left to the Web2Expo attendees to figure out how to build what their less grounded peers have already promised.
It’s been an interesting day.
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been bothering friends of mine with questions about how the Internet as we know it might die. Many of them are part of the Bitcurrent crew. We came up with a decent list, which I cleaned up and posted on GigaOm.
1500 Diggs and a lot of comments later, I have a lot of thoughts on the responses. First (though I shouldn’t be surprised) is the vitriol of Digg. It seems like any “top 10″ list is instantly considered lame, while at the same time it drives huge traffic. But there was some useful dialogue in the noise, too. Read More→