<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new take on cloud taxonomies: Migration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitcurrent.com/a-new-take-on-cloud-taxonomies-migration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitcurrent.com/a-new-take-on-cloud-taxonomies-migration/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Salem</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcurrent.com/a-new-take-on-cloud-taxonomies-migration/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Salem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=472#comment-582</guid>
		<description>I really like this taxonomy. I&#039;ve talked to a lot of people referring to EC2 and App Engine as if they were interchangeable cloud services.  Your taxonomy makes the differences stand out.

For completeness, you could add a &quot;Colocation&quot; (&quot;rackspace&quot; ?) layer at the bottom for just power-pipe-and-ping hosting. Examples are rackspace.com, Savvis, Verio, etc.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this taxonomy. I&#8217;ve talked to a lot of people referring to EC2 and App Engine as if they were interchangeable cloud services.  Your taxonomy makes the differences stand out.</p>
<p>For completeness, you could add a &#8220;Colocation&#8221; (&#8220;rackspace&#8221; ?) layer at the bottom for just power-pipe-and-ping hosting. Examples are rackspace.com, Savvis, Verio, etc.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Laird</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcurrent.com/a-new-take-on-cloud-taxonomies-migration/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Laird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=472#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Alistair,

Nice roundup! There are two predominant viewpoints for these taxonomy discussions - inside-out, and outside-in.

Much of the existing work to date has been inside-out: insiders in the industry discussing the nuances of different technical solutions and defining buckets to categorize them. This is very important for insiders to help drive detailed debates into who is doing what and with what technologies. But that is not the right focus for outsiders looking to solve a problem.

I think you have hit on the outside-in view. An outsider wants a solution to a project they already have or plan to build. They don&#039;t need to know the nuances to start with - they just want that short list of numbers to call to get engaged with the right providers. The sales teams will then help them sort out what they need. I like your &quot;If you have [this], look to [these] guys.&quot; approach for this.

A consumer friendly taxonomy!

PJL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alistair,</p>
<p>Nice roundup! There are two predominant viewpoints for these taxonomy discussions &#8211; inside-out, and outside-in.</p>
<p>Much of the existing work to date has been inside-out: insiders in the industry discussing the nuances of different technical solutions and defining buckets to categorize them. This is very important for insiders to help drive detailed debates into who is doing what and with what technologies. But that is not the right focus for outsiders looking to solve a problem.</p>
<p>I think you have hit on the outside-in view. An outsider wants a solution to a project they already have or plan to build. They don&#8217;t need to know the nuances to start with &#8211; they just want that short list of numbers to call to get engaged with the right providers. The sales teams will then help them sort out what they need. I like your &#8220;If you have [this], look to [these] guys.&#8221; approach for this.</p>
<p>A consumer friendly taxonomy!</p>
<p>PJL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rags</title>
		<link>http://www.bitcurrent.com/a-new-take-on-cloud-taxonomies-migration/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Rags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=472#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Good delineation. The lines are blurring. For example, QuickBase can do some SaaSy things as well. A minor nit. QuickBase is not the name of the company. It is Intuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good delineation. The lines are blurring. For example, QuickBase can do some SaaSy things as well. A minor nit. QuickBase is not the name of the company. It is Intuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

