Don Clark of the Wall Street Journal wrote about Finding a Friendly Cloud. And Richard Martin at Informationweek wrote about escaping from locked-in clouds.

Sounds like the big cloud panel got a lot of attention! Here’s a video of the controversial bits:

GigaOm’s Structure08 event is a wrap. It was an amazing turnout of people in the next-generation infrastructure world, and a packed day of panels and discussions.
I had my computer and phone off most of the time, since I was announcing speakers and moderating panels for much of the day. So I’m now scouring the net to see how we did.

• Here’s what Twitter had to say about it.
• Here’s Serph’s view of the event.
• Some photos of the event on Flickr.
• DCK wrote up some of the content
• Andy Abramson was pretty enthusiastic…
• The Register covered it well. They wrote pieces on Werner Vogels’ keynote, Google’s openness with App Engine, and Utility Computing’s “dirty little secret” (hint: it’s software licensing.)
• GigaOm’s Liz Gannes and Katie Fehrenbacher were furiously liveblogging the event.
• Readwriteweb wrote a great piece on cloud operations.
• Dan Farber, who covered Structure for CNET, wrote several pieces on the sessions.

I was incredibly lucky to have great panelists for panels on cloud platforms. While most of the discussions were fairly pragmatic, we did of course invent some new terms:

• “Bare metal” clouds: Clouds that aspire to nothing more than giving you root more economically.
• “Little Fluffy Clouds” (thanks to The Orb) after Tony Lucas referred to “Loving clouds” as those clouds which really want to do no evil.
• A cloud user’s bill of rights, which would outline portability and so on.
• “Cloudbursting”, the idea that an enterprise private cloud might burst into the public cloud temporarily.

I wish I’d known that Facebook was hiccuping while I was talking with the scaling panel, particularly since we had Jonathan Heiliger with us.

Then a dozen of us headed to an excellent pub on Haight and stayed up until far too late. Great end to a great couple of weeks in the Bay Area. Now, as the Spirit of the West say, it’s home for a rest. But I leave you with this.

I just finished watching a presentation on Eucalyptus, an open source layer for cloud computing that emulates Amazon’s EC2.

The Eucalyptus team replicated nearly all of EC2. They know this because they pulled down Amazon’s Web Services Description Language (WSDL), which describes the various function calls someone can make to Amazon, and made sure Eucalyptus could do the same thing. It’s not a secret; in fact, you can check it out here.

This raises an interesting point. For a traditional desktop developer, if two interfaces are identical, then writing code to one means it will work on the other just fine. But there are two other things to consider if you’re choosing a cloud platform: Operational reliability, and network effects.

The first one’s pretty basic: Don’t use someone who can’t keep their cloud running.

The second one is less obvious: The value of a cloud service isn’t just what it does; it’s also how many people use it.

For example:

• A friend feed on Facebook is vastly more useful than one on Friendster
• Someone building a CRM application on Salesforce has a lot more contacts and partners to work with than someone using Sugar
• A communications application built atop Webex Connect can automatically invite more people to a meeting than someone using Acrobat.com

In other words, when considering a cloud’s services, we can’t just look at the richness of the APIs it offers. We have to also consider the network effects it enjoys.

I’m in San Francisco this week for Velocity, CloudCamp and Structure’08 and the valley buzz du’jour is definitely Cloud Computing. Tomorrow evening is the inaugural CloudCamp and I’m bracing myself for more argument over the rules of membership in the Clouderati.

It strikes me that for the business minded, the question is not who’s in and who’s out, rather, who’s going to be able to stay in. Cloud is simply an IT delivery model. It comes with high customer expectations that few companies are tooled up to meet. 24×7 availability, self-service provisioning, pay-per-use billing and internet scale, all for $1.78 a month.

I’m hoping for good debate about Cloud adopters, their expectations, and how we can implement Clouds to meet them… without going broke. See you there.

…cross posted to duncanhill.com

GigaOm, one of the leading tech blogs, launched its Structure conference recently. We’re going to be getting involved with the conference, helping to find speakers and vet topics.

In fairly sharp contrast to technology conference that focus on the “how” of infrastructure, Structure looks at the “why.” As one of the GigaOm folks told us, this event is more about the ways changing infrastructure can fundamentally alter an online business.

[Read more]